<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Text Filters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2006/11/24/text-filters.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2006/11/24/text-filters.html</link>
	<description>20 minutes into the future...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:32:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lyons</title>
		<link>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2006/11/24/text-filters.html/comment-page-1#comment-11803</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2006/11/24/text-filters.html#comment-11803</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I was a doubter of Textile at first myself, but using it quickly convinced me. On the other hand, I have often wished for conversion to and from Textile, which is a feature that simply cannot exist for Textile, but does exist for Markdown. So maybe if you use Markdown from the beginning you&#039;ll like it better.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was a huge believer in CSS at first; it took many years for me to realize that it&#039;s a fundamentally stupid technology. I like that it seems to work in practice, but I think the difficulty in doing rather fundamental design things, like round corners, speaks to its lack of general applicability. It&#039;s basically a font tag with positioning. But unfortunately, it&#039;s the best we have. I just refuse to tow the party line. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a doubter of Textile at first myself, but using it quickly convinced me. On the other hand, I have often wished for conversion to and from Textile, which is a feature that simply cannot exist for Textile, but does exist for Markdown. So maybe if you use Markdown from the beginning you&#8217;ll like it better.</p>

<p>I was a huge believer in CSS at first; it took many years for me to realize that it&#8217;s a fundamentally stupid technology. I like that it seems to work in practice, but I think the difficulty in doing rather fundamental design things, like round corners, speaks to its lack of general applicability. It&#8217;s basically a font tag with positioning. But unfortunately, it&#8217;s the best we have. I just refuse to tow the party line. <img src='http://www.xxeo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
