<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: While Apple Refreshes, the &#8220;fastest processor in the world&#8221; was released</title>
	<link>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html</link>
	<description>20 minutes into the future...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jared Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html#comment-63125</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html#comment-63125</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Only required to release your changes in source form if you distribute!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only required to release your changes in source form if you distribute!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Schnepp</title>
		<link>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html#comment-56759</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Schnepp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html#comment-56759</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As seen in http://www.sun.com/processors/UltraSPARC-T2/specs.xml
each core is only capable of 8 thread. It states "Up to 8 cores, up to 64 threads per processor" (not per core).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As seen in <a href="http://www.sun.com/processors/UltraSPARC-T2/specs.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.sun.com/processors/UltraSPARC-T2/specs.xml</a>
each core is only capable of 8 thread. It states &#8220;Up to 8 cores, up to 64 threads per processor&#8221; (not per core).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel A. Falvo II</title>
		<link>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html#comment-50445</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel A. Falvo II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html#comment-50445</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Open hardware is becoming increasingly relevant.  One reason why Sun chose to GPL the core is to get a wider acceptance.  You don't need to license from Sun to produce this chip.  There is no paperwork involved.  Just download the VHDL/Verilog and go.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, modifications to the architecture are also released to the community.  So, for example, if I download and alter the T2 for my own purposes, I'm obligated by the terms of the GPL to make &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; alterations available in source form.  Now, someone else can take &lt;em&gt;my&lt;/em&gt; processor and run wild with it as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open hardware is becoming increasingly relevant.  One reason why Sun chose to GPL the core is to get a wider acceptance.  You don&#8217;t need to license from Sun to produce this chip.  There is no paperwork involved.  Just download the VHDL/Verilog and go.</p>

<p>Also, modifications to the architecture are also released to the community.  So, for example, if I download and alter the T2 for my own purposes, I&#8217;m obligated by the terms of the GPL to make <em>my</em> alterations available in source form.  Now, someone else can take <em>my</em> processor and run wild with it as well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dru</title>
		<link>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html#comment-50054</link>
		<dc:creator>dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html#comment-50054</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, dual-proc would be interesting. I think that is now
possible with the new T2 chip. The earlier chip was not
designed for SMP.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;About the GPL. That is just hype/publicity. Sun has always
licensed their designs to other manufacturers and avoided
having their own fab. The fact that the design is now open
under a viral license that forces the modifier to give their
design changes to Sun... is a non-event.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, dual-proc would be interesting. I think that is now
possible with the new T2 chip. The earlier chip was not
designed for SMP.</p>

<p>About the GPL. That is just hype/publicity. Sun has always
licensed their designs to other manufacturers and avoided
having their own fab. The fact that the design is now open
under a viral license that forces the modifier to give their
design changes to Sun&#8230; is a non-event.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan M.</title>
		<link>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html#comment-49929</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.xxeo.com/archives/2007/08/08/while-apple-refreshes-the-fastest-processor-in-the-world-was-released.html#comment-49929</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If these chips come anywhere near their potential it should be pretty cool.  I wouldn't mind running a dual-proc box that supports 1k "simultaneous" threads and would give me a SPECint around 150... &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My only question is what's the point of releasing the chip under GPL?  How many people (or even companies) have a 65nm fab to do anything with it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If these chips come anywhere near their potential it should be pretty cool.  I wouldn&#8217;t mind running a dual-proc box that supports 1k &#8220;simultaneous&#8221; threads and would give me a SPECint around 150&#8230; </p>

<p>My only question is what&#8217;s the point of releasing the chip under GPL?  How many people (or even companies) have a 65nm fab to do anything with it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
